Coalgate: Supreme Court expands scrutiny, issues notice to all mining states

PTI : New Delhi, Thu Sep 26 2013, 18:37 hrs

The court refused to pass any order to the companies allotted coal blocks to maintain status quo. (IE Photo)

The Supreme Court on Thursday issued notices to seven coal mining states asking them to explain their role in coal block allocation after the Centre washed off its hands in any irregularities, saying that its role was limited to identifying the blocks and rest was done by states.

Coalgate: Centre's stand contradictory, says Supreme Court

A bench headed by Justice R M Lodha directed the seven mining states--Madhya Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, Odisha, Jharkhand, Maharashtra, Chhattisgarh and West Bengal --to file their response on four questions framed by it by October 29.

The court refused to pass any order to the companies allotted coal blocks to maintain status quo, stating this can be considered only after hearing them.

SC notice to JSW, Centre, others on mining issue

The court's direction came after it had observed that the Centre was giving "contradictory" stands on allocations. The apex asked the state governments to file their response on how they understand the issue of allocation.

The Centre termed allocation by it as just an exercise of identification of blocks and at the most a letter of intent given to the companies by it.They were also asked to clarify the role played by the state in allocation of coal blocks which is done by the Centre and its role in subsequent steps having regard to the provisions of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act.

SC issues notice to Centre on coal block allocations

The bench also directed the states to file details of agreement entered by the state PSUs, which were allocated coal blocks, with private companies.

The court is scrutinising coal block allocation since 1993 on three PILs seeking cancellation of blocks on the ground that rules were flouted in giving away the natural resources and that certain companies were favoured in this process. The bench also made it clear that the response must be filed by a Secretary-level officer.